DMD 1.030 and 2.014 releases

[Jarrett Billingsley]

"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:g12s4e$j26$1 at digitalmars.com...
> "Walter Bright" <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote in message 
> news:g11ove$181r$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>>> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>>>> Any chance we'll be getting a backport of the fix to bug 493 in DMD 
>>>>> 1.031?   [ http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=493 ]
>>>>
>>>> I understand your point, and I have mixed feelings about it. The 
>>>> trouble is, it isn't a stable target if it gets language changes, and 
>>>> everyone has a different idea on what should be moved from 2.0 to 1.0.
>>>
>>> You're worried about existing D1 code that relies on IFTI failing?
>>
>> No, I'm concerned about different D1 compilers that support different 
>> languages.
>
> Uh, DMD 1.000 vs. DMD 1.030?

The point being that _this has already happened_ with, apparently, no real 
problems.