Revised RFC on range design for D2

Bruno Medeiros brunodomedeiros+spam at com.gmail
Fri Oct 3 03:40:11 PDT 2008


Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
> Here comes another person that would be unhappy without omittable 
> parenthesis.
> 
> Having properties is a very useful thing, one should be able to make a 
> public field of a structure private and controlling access via methods 
> with minimal or no changes to the external code.
> 

Like I said before to Andrei, the idea wasn't simply to drop the 
omittable parenthesis call, but also to find an alternate property 
mechanism.


-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Developer, MSc. in CS/E graduate
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list