Revised RFC on range design for D2
Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+spam at com.gmail
Fri Oct 3 03:40:11 PDT 2008
Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
> Here comes another person that would be unhappy without omittable
> parenthesis.
>
> Having properties is a very useful thing, one should be able to make a
> public field of a structure private and controlling access via methods
> with minimal or no changes to the external code.
>
Like I said before to Andrei, the idea wasn't simply to drop the
omittable parenthesis call, but also to find an alternate property
mechanism.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Developer, MSc. in CS/E graduate
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list