Revised RFC on range design for D2

[Benji Smith]

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>> In fact, I'm also not a fan of those complex property mechanisms, à lá 
>> C#. I think a fair candidate would be Bill Baxter's proposal, the 
>> 'property' keyword:
>>
>>   property int foo() { return _foo; };
>>   property void foo(int foo) { _foo = foo; };
>>
>> The property keyword would make a function callable *only* as a 
>> property syntax (either as reading, 'bar = foo;', or as writing, 'foo 
>> = 42;'). A function signature which was not adequate for property 
>> access would be compile-time error.
> 
> Then what would obj.fun mean when fun is not a property?
> 
> Andrei

If I understand the proposal correctly, it would be a compile-time error.

--benji