DMD 1.035 and 2.019 releases

[Walter Bright]

Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> This is one of those things I really dislike about D :(
> It's really nice that we can override struct initialization, but the 
> fact that it eliminates the possibility to override it (with a nice 
> syntax) makes it much less appealing IMHO.
> 
> The most important point to me, is that old thing about static struct 
> initializer and struct literals have different syntaxes, and that the 
> static variant is much more flexible.
> 
> I would have loved to see the static struct initializer syntax become an 
> expression. If the problem is ambiguity, why not just prefix the {} 
> braces with the struct name?

The static struct initializers more or less are inherited from C. I'd 
eventually like to abandon them and go completely to the S(args) syntax.