Revised RFC on range design for D2

[Pablo Ripolles]

Michel Fortin Wrote:

> On 2008-09-13 04:18:20 -0400, Pablo Ripolles <in-call at gmx.net> said:
> 
> > After having had some sleep, I kind of support Bill's proposal, that 
> > is, head/foot, definitely better than head/toe.  It's like the header 
> > and the footer! sounds very reasonable.  Of course I also like 
> > fore/aft, but thats because my aeronautical engineering bias.
> > 
> > tip is too ambiguous.
> > 
> > tail refers to all what comes after the head, not to its tip.
> > 
> > Cheers!
> 
> Anyone suggested head/rear yet?

Hello, if I remember well, yes.  I also like it!  I don't recall the argument against it though...