Revised RFC on range design for D2

[Kenny B]

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> How about this. Maybe if we attacked this annoyance in particular,
>> that would be a large bang for the buck without a landslide change in
>> the compiler. We only need some way to inform the compiler, "yes, it's
>> ok to call a.b(c) as a.b = c". Ideas?
> 
> I actually did have something in mind when I wrote this, just didn't
> want to bias anyone.
> 

For the record, you have my vote on this idea. it would greatly simplify a lot of my aliases and template usage in particular (though I'm using D1)

+1