QtD 0.1 is out!

[Max Samukha]

On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:55:58 +0900, Bill Baxter <wbaxter at gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Max Samukha
><samukha at voliacable.com.removethis> wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:06:46 -0500, Eldar Insafutdinov
>> <e.insafutdinov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step when compiling example, optlink crashed with a messagebox containing X86 registers content. This seems to be a blocker for qtd working on windows..
>>
>> This may be related to the famous
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=424, though we don't
>> make extensive use of templates.
>
>It can also happen because of a single very large file.  Perhaps one
>created by some sort of automatic code generation.  Anything like that
>in qtd?
>
>--bb

Yes, all modules are autogenerated. You are right, we probably should
think about splitting up that big file. For example, by placing enum
definitions into a separate module. It is still a less preferred
solution because it requires more tweaking of the original code
generator, which is already messy.