dmd 1.046 and 2.031 releases

[Ary Borenszweig]

Denis Koroskin wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:48:07 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu 
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
> 
>> Chad J wrote:
>>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>>> grauzone wrote:
>>>>> No. Also, this final switch feature seems to be only marginally
>>>>> useful, and normal switch statements do the same, just at runtime. So
>>>>> much for "more pressing issues" but it's his language and not mine so
>>>>> I'll shut up.
>>>> The final switch deals with a problem where you add an enum member in
>>>> one file and then have to find and update every switch statement that
>>>> uses that enum. There's no straightforward way to find them to ensure
>>>> the case gets added to each switch.
>>>>
>>>> It's solving a similar problem that symbolic constants do.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The fall-through thing, though, is purely local and so much less of an
>>>> issue.
>>>  huh?
>>>  These bugs always take me no less than 2 hours to find, unless I am
>>> specifically looking for fall-through bugs.
>>
>> I agree. Probably a good option would be to keep on requiring break, but
>> also requiring the user to explicitly specify they want fallthrough in
>> the rare case when they do want it. I'd love to use "continue" for that
>> but it's already "occupied" by cases like while (...) switch (...).
>> Requiring !break or ~break would work but is a bit too cute. Adding a
>> new keyword or a whole new switch statement is too much aggravation. I
>> guess we'll have to live with it...
>>
>>
>> Andrei
> 
> Reuse goto?

I was thinking "continue case;"

But of course this discussion is pointless because it's bikeshed 
idontknow...