dunit r247

[Christopher Wright]

Daniel Keep wrote:
> What about this syntax?
> 
> check!("% == 3 || % == 5")(foo(5));
> 
> This could display:
> 
> Expected: (% == 3 || % == 5) for <value of foo(5)>.
> 
> Then you don't have to dick about writing classes when you want to test
> something.  Rule one of a good API: get out of my way. :D
> 
>   -- Daniel

On the face of it, that seems reasonable. I'm not certain what I will do 
in that regard.