OT: Flash and Javascript (Was: Taunting)

[Saaa]

> IIRC, I think NoScript does let you do site-by-site, right? I just hope it
> plays nice with QuickJava though, (or contains QuickJava-style
It does, both.
> functionality), because trying to configure sites/pages manually would be 
> a major PITA and possibly not even be worth it.
>
> And then there's FlashBlock, which I *would* absolutely love...except it 
> *only* works with JS enabled!!! ^&$&^%^^&!!! And frankly, I just don't 
> have the time to dig into FF extension-writing and do things the way I 
> really want them.
Just use noscript for blocking flash
>
> But of course, these are all just clumbsy symptom-attacking hacks anyway, 
> not real solutions. Plus there's the issue that the more extentions you're 
> using, the slower FF gets... So at best you're just fixing one problem at 
> the cost of another.

Well actually, I think noscript is the solution.
In the period that new technologies are unfit for those who see their 
evilness, you can (partly) disable them until you think those technologies 
are that much better than the then 'new tech'.