ldc 0.9.1 released

[Nick Sabalausky]

"bearophile" <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com> wrote in message 
news:gvmtt5$5os$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Robert Fraser:
>> However, the DMDFE's organization relies on being able to declare class
>> member functions separately from where they're defined, which is
>> impossible in D (hint, hint, nudge, nudge).
>
> This current characteristics of D classes makes them a bit simpler to 
> read/understand/use.
> Can you tell me (and/or show a small example) where you think such 
> separation may improve some D code?
>

Yea, I haven't seen anything yet about lifting the one-to-one module-to-file 
mapping that would make breaking bud/rebuild-like tools worthwhile. But I'd 
be interested in hearing any arguments in favor of doing so.