QtD 0.2 release announcement.

[Denis Koroskin]

On Fri, 29 May 2009 13:54:58 +0400, Tomas Lindquist Olsen <tomas.l.olsen at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
> <e.insafutdinov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Eldar Insadutdinov Wrote:
>>
>>> Another release of QtD is out. This time, it's Linux-only because  
>>> OPTLINK refuses to link the project with debug info on Windows (see  
>>> bug http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2436). If anybody  
>>> wants QtD on Windows, please keep pushing Walter until he does  
>>> something with OPTLINK (bury it). Voting for the bug may help, too.
>>> I would repeat once again the request, that was raised here numerous  
>>> of times, Walter, please change object file format, for me the ones  
>>> used by MSVC or MinGW would be just fine.
>>>
>>> In this release:
>>>
>>> * Lots of bugfixes
>>> * Switched to Qt 4.5
>>> * ldc supported (for both X86 and X86-64)
>>> * All imports inside Qt are now public to avoid import hell
>>> * Implemented API dealing with containers
>>> * All classes from Gui, OpenGL, Xml, Svg, Network and Webkit packages
>>> are wrapped
>>> * Build system is now based on CMake to be crossplatform and more
>>> flexible
>>> * New signals and slots implementation (pretty limited but we are
>>> working on a better one, which will support queued connections,
>>> connections by name at runtime, etc).
>>> * Ported duic, the tool for generating code out of xml representation
>>> * Ported drcc, the resources compiler
>>>
>>> Thanks to everyone involved in the project.
>>
>> So apparently I made it working on Windows as well. The thing that  
>> solved the problem was to feed source files to the compiler in the  
>> different order. Is it a correct behaviour?
>>
>
> The DMD frontend has quite a few "order dependencies". It's not
> correct behaviour, but a result of how it does semantics.

Is it fixable, or a new frontend is required?