bugzilla 424 - Unexpected OPTLINK Termination - solved!

[Tim Matthews]

Bill Baxter wrote:
> 
> So is it any slower now with things not in ASM?
> 
> --bb
> 

You are not serious are you? The linker not the linked?

If it's functionally more correct, easier to understand and easier to 
implement link time optimizations then how can anyone justify asm to c 
transition (where asm is not required) as a disadvantage?