bugzilla 424 - Unexpected OPTLINK Termination - solved!
Franklin Minty
franmin at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 01:06:00 PST 2009
Tim Matthews Wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
> >
> > So is it any slower now with things not in ASM?
> >
> > --bb
> >
>
> You are not serious are you? The linker not the linked?
>
> If it's functionally more correct, easier to understand and easier to
> implement link time optimizations then how can anyone justify asm to c
> transition (where asm is not required) as a disadvantage?
it will be slower - I want my 100ms back.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list