Code Poet, an IDE for D

[Walter Bright]

dsimcha wrote:
> I thought (I'm not 100% sure on either of these counts) that:
> 
> 1.  We don't want anything in Phobos that requires attribution for works
> distributed exclusively in binary form, even if the license is otherwise
> permissive.  This means we can't use BSD-licensed code in Phobos.

Right.

> 2.  Creative commons isn't entirely clear about whether attribution would be
> required for stuff distributed in pure binary form.

Hmm. That would be a problem.