Code Poet, an IDE for D
Robert Jacques
sandford at jhu.edu
Thu Nov 12 16:06:30 PST 2009
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:34:31 -0500, Walter Bright
<newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> dsimcha wrote:
>> I thought (I'm not 100% sure on either of these counts) that:
>> 1. We don't want anything in Phobos that requires attribution for
>> works
>> distributed exclusively in binary form, even if the license is otherwise
>> permissive. This means we can't use BSD-licensed code in Phobos.
>
> Right.
>
>> 2. Creative commons isn't entirely clear about whether attribution
>> would be
>> required for stuff distributed in pure binary form.
>
> Hmm. That would be a problem.
Binary form counts as a derivative work, so unless it's specifically
waived you have to included it.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list