dmd 1.063 and 2.048 release

Don nospam at nospam.com
Mon Aug 16 00:11:56 PDT 2010


Brad Roberts wrote:
> On 8/15/2010 12:54 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> This may be a pain to do, but you could narrow it down from the other
>>> direction: recompile DMD from various trunk revisions between 2.046 and 2.047
>>> and see which actual commit created the problem.
>> Try mixing/matching the compiler & Phobos to see which one of those caused the
>> issue.
> 
> While I agree that it's worth trying a bisection -- it's generally really quick
> and easy to do (the compiler and libraries build rather fast -- about a minute
> for me).  It can be a very useful technique for finding where bugs were introduced.
> 
> That said, it's likely to be rather difficult for this release due to the number
> of fixes in the compiler that the library requires and for the periods during
> which the two didn't work together.
> 
> Do try it.. worst case is you've wasted a little bit of time.  Best case you've
> found the cause of the bug.
> 
> Later,
> Brad

The latest compiler should work with the old Phobos, except that it will 
complain about the a&b==c bugs. That's simple to do, it just involves 
copying the 2.048 compiler onto the 2.047 release. Knowing if it is the 
compiler or Phobos/druntime would be an enormous help.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list