d support in codeblocks

[Matthias Pleh]

>>
>> Thanks. I got a build working and have tested it out. It seems that 
>> you've made a substantial change to the default syntax highlighting, 
>> both in the terms you use and their settings. Now, most of them I can 
>> fix to how I want, but the normal 'selected' settings are substantially 
>> better and more complex than a simple foreground and background color. 
>> Also, I'd strongly recommend keeping the current code::block standard 
>> highlighting if you're planning to have your trunk merged into the 
>> mainline tree.
>
> And one more thing, it doesn't appear that the -g option when linking in 
> debug mode is working.


Thanks for your report!

to 1.)
I haven't changed any code for the lexer (It's anyway not code from 
codeblocks but
rather from scintilla)
I only have added more tags in the xml-file and  have changed the colors.
But this is only a draft. The most colors was taken from the examples on the 
DigitalMars Page,
couse I think this is rather the official standard for D.
I also don't understand, why we should take the same colors, as it is used 
in C++ ??
But feel free to send me your version (lexer_d.xml) or a description how you 
want it and I would have a look at it.

I have also tried a version with 8 different keywordgroups (as it is in 
Poseidon) and different
colors for normal-string, raw-string, and so on ...
but for my taste this is too much, I like it simple.

to2.)
which OS/compiler?