dcollections 1.0 and 2.0a beta released

[BLS]

On 21/05/2010 19:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I'll now slowly answer the great replies I got in this thread, in
> chronological order. Since I read them all before replying, I might
> sometimes refer to future posts. Hopefully that won't be too confusing.
>
> Andrei

Following the dcollection thread, it seems that your argument is that 
Interfaces in a non hierarchical collection library are useless.
Or : Hierarchical collection libs are nonsense and ergo interfaces are 
obsolete.

ok Some collection types belong to the same family. So they should be 
loosely coupled. How to do that without having Interfaces ?
Next  f.i. forwardranges belongs to a certain family of collections. and 
Ranges are (or should be) Interfaces.
You see me very confused.

Bjoern
given
struct node
class col : IFWRange
node Node;
// No ?