dcollections 1.0 and 2.0a beta released

Steven Schveighoffer schveiguy at yahoo.com
Mon May 24 08:40:49 PDT 2010


On Fri, 21 May 2010 22:56:54 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev  
<vladimir at thecybershadow.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 May 2010 04:42:35 +0300, Steven Schveighoffer  
> <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> interfaces
>
> Does that imply that the most important methods are virtual?
>
> If so, say good-bye to inlining, and hello to an additional level of  
> dereferencing.
>
> Without meaning any disrespect to all the work you did, allow me to say  
> that I won't use a library that could be faster (without making usage  
> too clumsy), but isn't. (I prefer my D programs to be as fast as  
> reasonably possible - if I didn't care about speed, I'd use another  
> language.) For the same reasons, I'd be disappointed if the library was  
> admitted as-is into Phobos, since it doesn't live up to my personal  
> ideal of what D should be.

With the future update that all the classes are final, then they are not  
virtual as long as you don't use the interfaces.

-Steve


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list