SHOO's time code

[Moritz Warning]

On Wed, 19 May 2010 06:45:42 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

> On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:10:05 -0400, Moritz Warning
> <moritzwarning at web.de> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:24:40 +0000, superdan wrote:
>>
>>> == Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schveiguy at yahoo.com)'s article
>>>> On Tue, 18 May 2010 09:39:12 -0400, superdan <super at dan.org> wrote:
>>>> > guys go with boost and std.gregorian n shit. sorry shoo. tango is a
>>>> > fucking boat anchor for d. shit.
>>>> Having written most of the API for tango.time, I sorta like it :)  I
>>>> really like the API that SHOO came up with based on it.  If there's
>>>> any way to get SHOO's code into Phobos, I want to pursue that first. 
>>>> If this fails, we can go with boost.
>>>> -Steve
>>>
>>> i feel ya bro. i once sorta liked a hoe with herpes.
>>>
>>> way i c it is simple. it's fucking dates and fucking times. wut the
>>> fuck. ain't a fucking operating system. no matter how u dress a pig u
>>> still call it a fucking pig. if u have da datetime functionality it
>>> don't matter to be cute. we is wasting time sucking lars douche's cock
>>> 2 give us permission 2 his fucking shit. fuck that shit. dis must be
>>> da least amount of power that got to some idiot's head.
>>
>> Wut?
>>
>> Person A wrote some code and had a look at code from person B. Now
>> person C says that A need to get permission from B so that C can use
>> the code from A.
>> The reason is because the license of the code written by B isn't quite
>> compatible with the license recently chosen by C.
>>
>> And now you are calling B an idiot/douche for that reason?
> 
> Let's make it a bit clearer.  Person A *used* the code from person B,
> and used the *documentation* of said code to write his own similar
> library. Person A has not claimed that he looked at the source.
I agree, that's more accurate.

> Person B claims that it is impossible to do so without actually looking 
at the
> source, but has not yet cited any specific copying.  Person C doesn't
> want any trouble, and just is being extra careful.
Afaik, Person B haven't looked at the source in question but relied on 
what others said.
I think it was a move forward in anticipation to Person Cs license 
sensibility.
Anyway, Person B haven't hesitated when asked to give permission himself.


> I don't really like the situation, but if this is the way it has to be,
> then let's get it done and move on.
right :)

> -Steve