the bit[] type

[Stewart Gordon]

On 22/09/2010 22:26, Emil Madsen wrote:
> Okay I'm interresting in getting more infomation about the bit[] type;
> - is it still implemented in D1?

bit is now just an alias of bool, defined in object.

> - and why was it removed?

I think because there were too many complaints of bugs with it, and the 
conclusion was reached that it's too difficult to implement without bugs.

> - is it possible to get a link to the design considerations of removing
> it, and such?
<snip>

There must have been a discussion that led to it, but I can't find it at 
the moment.

Stewart.