dmd 1.069 and 2.054 release

[Daniel Murphy]

"Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote in message 
news:mailman.1520.1310357559.14074.digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com...
> Now, if deprecated were improved to take a message (and to allow for soft
> deprecation, since the messages printing here are about stuff being 
> scheduled
> for deprecation rather than actually being deprecated yet), then maybe 
> they
> could give a useful file and line number (at least for the functions), 
> since
> then the compiler would know that a function was scheduled for deprecation 
> and
> could warn you about using it. But since the best that we have for that is
> pragmas, that doesn't work. And actually, without that sort of feature, 
> any
> function that isn't a template can't even have such a message - at best it 
> can
> have a note in the documentation.
>

Would the following cover all the common use cases? (Phobos seems to be the 
biggest user of deprecated so far)

deprecated("message") int a;
deprecated("message", warn) int b;

With deprecated(warn) messages only being displayed with warnings enabled.

As in, an implementation of 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5481