D2 port of Tango

[zsxxsz]

== Quote from Damian Ziemba (nazriel at driv.pl)'s article
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:27:40 +0300, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
> > +1 to Caligo. I agree that Tango is a good library (and was the best one
> > for D1) but, IMHO, porting it to D2 is a bad idea.
> > I'm the one who has a big D1+Tango project and I'd better rewrite it
> > with D2+Phobos, because:
> >
> >      0. I don't want to have a "two standard libraries problem" with D2
> > (which one to select?).
> >
> You don't have to. You can use Tango and Phobos together.
> You can also use some selected modules :) For example in one of my
> projects I use cipher and digest modules from Tango and rest is Phobos.
> >      1. Phobos has a better design (Tango is too complicated in some
> > places, has a lot of things I (and a regular programmer IMHO) don't use,
> > and has bad design decisions sometimes - both internal and user API)
> >
> I totally disagree :) Show me example of such bad decision.
> >      2. Phobos has less _critical bugs_ because of better code control
> > (e.g. Tango has memory corruption bug for a very long time in Vector
> > container (#2064)).
> >
> Tickets and Patches are always welcome :)
> >      3. There is no Andrei Alexandrescu clone to generate that perfect
> > ideas for Tango.
> This one made me rotfl in real :D Haha. Tango had some best developers in
> D community including h3r3tic, Kris, Fawzi, Sean and so on, so on :)

I don't like Phobos design, which takes all libs in the same path looking so
urgly, but tango seperate libs in different path according to its function using,
so I like tango's design.