Native GTK bindings v2

Marco Leise Marco.Leise at gmx.de
Sat Apr 21 15:06:08 PDT 2012


Am Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:46:18 +0200
schrieb Artur Skawina <art.08.09 at gmail.com>:

> On 04/21/12 19:16, Marco Leise wrote:
> > I just noticed cairo.d is still a dummy. I am using image surfaces. 
> 
> Yes, cairo.d is generated from GI data too and only contains the few symbols
> and types required to use the other libs. There are other cairo D bindings, which
> probably could be used with a small glue layer. Making sane cairo bindings is
> on my to-do list, but I won't have the time for that in the next few weeks. 

No hurry, I have GtkD. It's biggest win is that it is considered stable and usable by many for a long time.

> "-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Wl,--gc-sections" is a good idea, but I found it to break exception throwing for my programs.
> 
> GDC/DMD? Would you happen to have a small contained sample that breaks?
> Not garbage collecting sections means executables that are several times
> larger (IIRC for the small gtk example the difference was 1.2M vs 0.3M).
> 
> artur

No example. I don't know what I tried it on, but I remember that I was hunting a bug that occurred, because an important exception wasn't thrown. I think it was a plain old "throw ...". It was with GDC, since DMD doesn't offer a one-section-per-function flag. I can give it a second try. I didn't post any bug reports, since gc-sections is a difficult beast:
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/issue/293/ffunction-sections-fdata-sections-for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788107
Without support from Iain, I don't expect a bug would be fixed by adding some hack to keep a function from being garbage collected (or whatever caused me problems).

-- 
Marco



More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list