Getting ready for 2.061
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Sat Dec 22 17:43:12 PST 2012
On Saturday, December 22, 2012 17:36:11 Brad Roberts wrote:
> On 12/22/2012 3:44 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> > What is nice about making a pull request against staging is that the
> > reviewer knows that the fix can be applied that far (not that comments
> > wouldn't do the same).
>
> I don't believe those assertions to be true. Merging in either direction is
> possible and the difficulty lies in the nature of the drift between the
> two. Neither direction is necessarily any easier than the other.
If you merge from the branch to master, then there's a higher risk of
forgetting to merge fixes. If you merge from master to the branch, then there's
a higher risk of putting changes in the branch that you don't want in the
branch. However, as long as the changes on master aren't too large, you can
simply cherry-pick the changes from master to the branch (or vice versa)
without too much trouble. Overall though, I would think that the risk of
screwing up is higher if commits go to the branch initially rather than
master.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list