dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release

[Timon Gehr]

On 02/16/2012 08:05 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Thursday, February 16, 2012 15:27:26 F i L wrote:
>> Marco Leise wrote:
>>> I'm just repeating what's already been said, but UFCS on
>>> classes and structs has the problem of ambiguities with proper
>>> methods of those. If 2.058 introduced more UFCS, then it is for
>>> literals. Try "123.foo;".
>>
>> C#'s had "UFSC" for years without ambiguity problems. Also,
>> "123.foo;" doesn't work.
>
> C# doesn't have free functions. So, how could it have UFCS?
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb383977.aspx