DVM - D Version Manager 0.4.0

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Mon Jan 9 04:10:51 PST 2012


On 2012-01-09 10:14, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Jacob Carlborg"<doob at me.com>  wrote in message
> news:jee58o$54v$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> On 2012-01-08 21:34, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> "Jacob Carlborg"<doob at me.com>   wrote in message
>>> news:jec1j6$2rbu$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>>> * Move to github
>>>
>>> It's ultimately up to you, but personally I can't stand Github. My vote
>>> would be to stick with Bitbucket.
>>>
>>> Granted, I haven't actually tried Bitbucket's Git support yet. But just
>>> yesterday I started the process of converting a couple of my projects
>>> from
>>> SVN/Dsource to Git/Bitbucket, so we'll see how it goes, and I'll let you
>>> know.
>>
>> I'm asking you since you're the main contributor next to me. I prefer
>> Github, many D project are moving to Github, DMD, Phobos and druntime are
>> already there. But certainly don't want to push you away, that wouldn't be
>> good for the Windows port :)
>>
>
> While I would find github more painful, it wouldn't make me decrease my
> contributions to DVM. DVM's too important a tool, IMO (Much like RDMD, which
> I also contribute too).

I'm glad to hear to. I'll have to think about it then.

> Heck, maybe if we're lucky that OSX desktop interface to github will someday
> get ported to Lin or Win :)
>
> I'm on my way to bed so I'll check out those links later. (FWIW, I don't
> think Ruby's all that bad as far as dynamic langauges go. Probably one of
> the best, actually. It's just no D ;) )

Hehe, ok.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list