dstep instead of SWIG

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-03-05 09:42, Gour wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:18:19 +0100
> Jacob Carlborg<doob at me.com>  wrote:
>
>> It's not there yet but that's the idea.
>
> Thank you. It makes dstep attractive alternative then.
>
> What would be some pro/cons of dstep vs SWIG?
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Gour
>
>

Well, I'm not familiar with SWIG but a few pros for DStep would probably be:

* Specifically targeted for D
* Handles Objective-C
* No need for interface files
* Uses a complete frontend to do the parsing
* Static linking

Pros for SWIG

* Handles C++
* In a more complete sate

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg