UFCS for D

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 01:55:23 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> <wishful musing>I've been starting to think
> more and more that the "everything in a module is a friend" was 
> a mistake,and that we should have instead just had a "module"
> access specifier like we have "package".</wishful musing>

Or, for moar compatibility, have enemy functions.

class Klingon { private Starship commanding; }
void nonFriend(enemy Klingon kor) {
     kor.commanding = lol; // error, commanding is private and kor 
is an enemy
}


Or, to avoid having a new keyword, call it interface
instead of enemy.

Though, then you could just pass an interface instead of
a class too. Take most general possible type.



But, separate modules are kinda cool anyway. I often put
stuff together in one module just for ease of distribution,
but eh modules are cool.