User Defined Attributes

[deadalnix]

Le 06/11/2012 19:02, Walter Bright a écrit :
> On 11/6/2012 9:34 AM, dennis luehring wrote:
>> can't you please give us a bad-usage example why it is/should be
>> forbidden to
>> use UDA on parameters (and please - we are not talking about pure, in,
>> out and
>> stuff like that)
>
> I believe this is the wrong question. For a new feature, the question
> should be "why should it be included", not "why shouldn't it be included."
>

No. It is needed to annotate symbols, uses cases are numerous. Now, if 
an exception is added, the exception should be justified.