Remus

[Namespace]

On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 at 20:03:21 UTC, Tavi Cacina wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 at 16:39:24 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>>> I'm learning the D language right now, and I can not say that 
>>> I've missed any of these things. They may offer some 
>>> 'syntactic sugar', but the D is very expressive anyway. Ex: 
>>> for safe invocation I would use an assert/enforce anyway if 
>>> there is a chance the object is null. The 'import package' 
>>> whould be usefull though...
>>
>> Which language(s) did you use before? Java? ;)
>
> I'm on the C++ wagon, thus the plain and simple (though 
> expressive) syntax of D is what keeps me here :-)
> It is just my opinion, because you asked for feedback :-) Hack 
> forward as you like it...

No offense. :)
But if you came from C++: didn't you miss (not-null) references?