User Defined Attributes

[deadalnix]

Le 07/11/2012 13:01, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
> On 2012-11-07 12:05, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
>
>> OK, that's another thing. And maybe a reason for listening to people
>> having
>> more experience with UDAs than you.
>>
>> For me the analogy with Exceptions is pretty good. The issues an
>> conveniences
>> of throwing anything or annotating a symbol with anything instead of just
>> type are pretty much the same. I only see functions making sense to be
>> accepted
>> as annotations too (that's what Python do with annotations,
>> @annotation symbol
>> is the same as symbol = annotation(symbol), but is quite a different
>> language).
>
> I start to more and more think it would be better to explicitly require
> the developer to declare an attribute, like:
>
> attribute foo
> {
> string name;
> }
>
> @foo("asd") int a;
>

Yes that was pretty close to what my proposal looked like in the big 
annotation thread, except I used @ttribute .