User Defined Attributes

[David Nadlinger]

On Thursday, 15 November 2012 at 08:45:49 UTC, Tove wrote:
> I disagree, you can always fallback to using user defined 
> types... but it _allows_ for native types also, i.e. more 
> flexible.

You are missing the point: In your proposal, if you want to use 
two libraries together which are expecting you to provide e.g. 
'int' annotations, you are screwed. This is a big, BIG problem.

David