Remus

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-11-21 19:11, Namespace wrote:

> Nothing, if enough people say that they need him I will implement them
> again.
> But maybe better. :)

Cool :)

> const in D1 isn't the const as in D2 and enforce only that the object
> cannot be assigned again? Strange. O.o

Yes, it worked a bit more like "const" in C than in C++. I just came to 
think of this since you mentioned "lazy const".

> But then I will think about it. Schould not be much work.

Thanks.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg