Remus
Namespace
rswhite4 at googlemail.com
Thu Nov 22 03:55:07 PST 2012
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 07:14:38 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
> On 2012-11-21 21:48, Namespace wrote:
>
>> Hm, I like the Idea.
>> But I would prefer:
>> private:
>> int _bar in(int val) {
>> _bar = val;
>> } out {
>> return _bar;
>> }
>
> The point was to make the syntax short. I wouldn't consider
> this much of an improvement.
IMO is too short not always the best. Therefore I like the C#
syntax with set and get. The aquivalent of this in D is IMO 'in'
and 'out'.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list