Slides from LASER 2012

[bearophile]

Timon Gehr:

> Formalising it is not hard,

I am not sure of this, given the amount of special cases it 
already has.


> The number of lines equals the Haskell example in this case.
> Interestingly, you have opened an enhancement request on this 
> and then argued against it.

I am not against it, it's a nice syntax. But I think there are 
more useful things to change/add, like syntax to destructure 
tuples, that I need every 20 lines of code or so. When you put 
out many suggestions, I think it's important to specify what you 
think is more important and what's less important.


> There is no 'right' way.

So we don't agree even on what we have to agree :-)

And having multiple correct ways to do something is often bad :-(

Bye,
bearophile