Start of dmd 2.064 beta program

[Frustrated]

On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:39:27 UTC, eles wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:34:37 UTC, dennis luehring 
> wrote:
>> Am 31.10.2013 16:22, schrieb eles:
>>> On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:13:20 UTC, dennis luehring
>>> wrote:
>>>> Am 31.10.2013 16:01, schrieb eles:
>>>>> On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:15 UTC, dennis 
>>>>> luehring
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
>>>>>>> On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis 
>>>>>>> luehring
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis
>>>>>>>>> luehring
>> no problem :)
>>
>> so tell the story what would happen if D scripts will be 
>> without .d?
>> is your Boss then more interested or can you introduce 
>> D-scripts then silently - what would happen?
>
> He won't really care as long as I don't ask him to modify his 
> scripts to update the names of those used by me. The latter are 
> already hard-coded in his and others.
>
> Yes, this has a solution: use of hardlinks (of 
> identical-content, different name files). I already explained 
> and acknowledged that in the very first post.
>
> But is cumbersome and unpleasant and bad for backup-ing.

Why not simply rename .d to . then compile, rename back using a 
script? It might add a few extra seconds for very large projects 
but otherwise insignificant and should work most of the time.

Basically you'll use the script or wrapper app instead of 
whatever compile you are using.