DIP22 : Private symbol visibility

[David Nadlinger]

On Friday, 1 February 2013 at 09:36:19 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 January 2013 at 20:43:14 UTC, Jesse Phillips 
> wrote:
>> I meant more that these questions should be answered the DIP 
>> page.
>
> Sure, I just want to gather more opinions before doing version 
> 2 of DIP. Most likely will gather all together this weekend.

I think at this point it is amply clear that the introduction of 
a "static"/"internal" keyword is much more controversial than the 
change to "private".

Thus, I'd recommend splitting up the DIP, so we can make progress 
on the "private" issue ASAP.

David