DIP22 : Private symbol visibility

[Dicebot]

On Saturday, 2 February 2013 at 13:27:46 UTC, David Nadlinger 
wrote:
> On Friday, 1 February 2013 at 09:36:19 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Thursday, 31 January 2013 at 20:43:14 UTC, Jesse Phillips 
>> wrote:
>>> I meant more that these questions should be answered the DIP 
>>> page.
>>
>> Sure, I just want to gather more opinions before doing version 
>> 2 of DIP. Most likely will gather all together this weekend.
>
> I think at this point it is amply clear that the introduction 
> of a "static"/"internal" keyword is much more controversial 
> than the change to "private".
>
> Thus, I'd recommend splitting up the DIP, so we can make 
> progress on the "private" issue ASAP.
>
> David

Agree, that was my conclusion, too.