An article about contract programming
bearophile
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Wed Feb 6 03:18:08 PST 2013
Walter Bright:
> Invariants, per the spec, [...]
Right, I was proposing a little spec change.
--------------------
Don:
> Sounds like bug 519 to me.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=519
Hours ago I have added this:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9454
They are very similar, the test case from Issue 519 uses a new:
class Foo {
invariant() {
assert (false);
}
}
void main() {
Foo foo = new Foo();
}
While in Issue 9454 (just like in that Ada code) there is no new:
struct Foo {
int x = 200;
invariant() { assert(x > 100); }
}
void main() {
auto f = Foo(10);
}
Maybe my Issue 9454 should be merged with Issue 519.
Bye,
bearophile
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list