D 1.076 and 2.061 release

[eles]

On Friday, 4 January 2013 at 07:03:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 1/3/2013 9:49 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> but other lines like
>>
> Yes, you can put this in as the bugzilla title, though I'd 
> tighten it up a little.

>
> This is 3 separate enhancements, each of which should be its 
> own issue, and will certainly fit as the issue title.

One problem that I see with the current form of Bugzilla query is 
that is quite difficult to inform the user about how the 
enhancement are connected one with another (for example, if one 
new feature requires another new feature or changing an old 
behavior). These may be part of several Bugzilla issues and there 
is no easy way to highlight this logical connection through the 
SQL query.

Also, not even the physical proximity of logically-related issues 
is not achievable through Bugzilla (maybe the issue which appears 
at the top is a logical consequence of the issue that appears at 
the bottom, or maybe they are related in terms of strategy and 
goals, but who's gonna say that and how?).

I would vote for requiring explicitly that the pull request 
properly modifies the documentation in those parts that it impacs.