D 1.076 and 2.061 release
Pierre Rouleau
prouleau001 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 5 01:30:41 PST 2013
On 13-01-04 3:55 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 1/4/2013 12:23 PM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
>> On 13-01-04 2:06 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> On 1/4/2013 8:59 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
>>>> Don't you think a process that requires reviewing these titles
>>>> *before* the
>>>> actual software release announcement posting would help?
>>>
>>> Of course it would. Do you wish to help? All help is welcome.
>>>
>> I was thinking about that too. I just don't know where to start. I
>> guess I
>> would have to read the developers guidelines and find out about the
>> documentation markup. What should I read first?
>
> Probably the easiest thing to start with is simply review the titles of
> bugzilla issues appearing in the new/changed list. You can edit them as
> required.
>
OK, I'll start going through the list of D2.062 and then D 2.061. I'll
take me time as I have to learn quite a bit, but you're right, and I
would probably have proposed the same thing have I been in your shoes.
Point taken and thanks!
I noticed that D 2.062 has no new features. What would it take to
remove the link to New/Changed Features on that version since there are
none?
/Pierre
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list