DIP22 : Private symbol visibility

[Dicebot]

http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP22

There are two important issues with current protection attribute
design:

* Senseless name clashes between private and public symbols
* No way to specify internal linkage storage class

This DIP addresses both of them with two decoupled proposals:

* Change of private related name resolution rules
* Definition of static storage class for module-scope symbols.

___________________________________________

Quotes, data and link to previous discussion:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Access_specifiers_and_visibility

___________________________________________

I think this is the point where public discussion will do more
good than my own exploration of corner cases. Please destroy and
pay closest attention to compile-time reflection - I have a
feeling I have missed something there.