Why implicit conversion of string literal to char[] does not works?
Regan Heath
regan at netmail.co.nz
Tue Jul 2 08:39:05 PDT 2013
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:20:04 +0100, Michal Minich
<michal.minich at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 14:26:54 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 at 13:51:15 UTC, Michal Minich wrote:
>>> As this cast (on linux), will _allways_ result in undefined behavior.
>>> It is something compiler can easily tell, and advice "use .dup
>>> instead of cast..."
>>
>> Casting away const/immutable is not undefined, modifying
>> const/immutable data is. Since you cast away immutable the compiler can
>> no longer prevent you from making such modifications.
>
> You are right, the cast itself will not result in undefined behavior.
> But it might give you value on which any write operation will. So why
> not warn programer of such behavior when we can know it statically.
Ideally we would. However, 99.9% of cases will not be this simple/static,
so adding this feature to the compiler is not cost effective.. at this
stage.
R
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list