echo: "-n", the next installment

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On Saturday, 27 July 2013 at 12:19:44 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it wouldn't work ideally for echo as the 
> behaviour depends on the order of the arguments.


It also has some odd little niggles -- e.g. it's not nice that 
with a short option you can have --t 5 and --t=5 but not -t 5 or 
-t=5 (according to docs you can only use -t5 ).