D at University of Minnesota

[Carl Sturtivant]

> Sure, there's stuff that TDPL doesn't describe, but TDPL never 
> described
> everything (for instance, it doesn't go into a detailed 
> explanation of the
> various types of is expressions). But that's different from it 
> being incorrect
> due to language changes, which seems to be what Carl is saying 
> is happening.

What happened is that I unclear what the state of play is; I am 
not asserting the wrongness of TDPL. Still, I am reassured by 
your responses.