DConf 2013 Day 3 Talk 2: Code Analysis for D with AnalyzeD by Stefan Rohe

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:12:09 -0400, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:

> On 2013-06-14 10:58, bearophile wrote:
>
>> So I suggested to offer the tools, but not a complete built-in solution.
>
> I agree. You can get quite far with what we have now and library  
> support. Perhaps we could have a couple of different implementations in  
> druntime that we can choose from.

With @UDAs, we have a lot of unrealized power for unit tests.

I have asked for ModuleInfo to contain an rtInfo member [1], like TypeInfo  
does.  With that, and possibly splitting the unit tests into individual  
functions (if not done already, I don't know), you have all you need to  
completely re-design the unit testing framework.  It can even be runtime  
selectable.

-Steve

[1] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10023