[Phoronix] D Language Still Showing Promise, Advancements
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Thu Jun 20 12:24:38 PDT 2013
On Thursday, June 20, 2013 21:05:46 TommiT wrote:
> Currently, I think they're discussing if it's possible to add
> mutable external iterators to Rust, which doesn't seem possible,
> because the strong memory safety Rust has chosen to operate
> within is quite restrictive. And if you can't have external
> iteration, you can't have generic algorithms, and no proper
> generic programming. I think that's a pretty good argument
> against Rust at the moment, but who knows, maybe they can figure
> it out. There's some info:
> http://www.marshut.com/nxyuu/the-future-of-iterators-in-rust.html
>
> But I wouldn't go around bashing Rust, it seems a very nice
> language.
I haven't really looked into Rust, but from everything I've heard, it sounds
like it's still very much in research and development mode, so I don't think
that we can really have any clue where it'll be when it's actually ready for
production use. It sounds like they have a lot of interesting ideas that
they're trying out, which may or may not pan out, and we'll just have to wait
and see where they end up.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list