Go vs. D [was Re: Rust vs Dlang]

[Dmitry Olshansky]

17-Mar-2013 14:06, Russel Winder пишет:
> On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 01:57 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> […]
>> I'd like to add that D has:
>>
>> - operator overloading
>> - user defined attributes
>> - dll's (coming soon)
>> - vector operations
>> - SIMD operations
>> - scope guard
>> - compile time function execution
>> - true immutability and purity
>> - inline assembler
> […]
>
> On the other hand "creeping featurism" can be a bad thing. Isn't the
> mantra "small language, large (properly indexed) library"?
>

Built-in channels and goroutines don't count as feature creep ? ;)

> Immutability though I like. Single assignment rules.
>
> Inline assembler is anathema.
>
>> Andrei did some tests a while back showing that D compiles considerably faster
>> than Go. High compilation speed has been a major factor among companies who have
>> adopted D.
>
> Excellent.
>
> Java / Scala is an interesting battle: Java is massively verbose, Scala
> is not; Java takes a while to compile, Scala takes eons. Hence static
> Groovy (as well as dynamic), and Kotlin. The jury is still out on
> whether Ceylon has any relevance to the universe.
>
> PS Can I have shared objects last week please ;-)
>


-- 
Dmitry Olshansky